plustek film scanner 7200 dpi
PostPosted: Mon Aug 16, 2004 5:22 am
This is great film scanner, unexpensive and excellent work performance.
Kind regards
Sonny Noack
Page 1 of 1
PostPosted: Wed Aug 18, 2004 4:18 pm
And it is even better with SilverFast, isn't it
Kind regards
Sonny Noack
Kind regards
Sonny Noack
Re: plustek film scanner 7200 dpi
PostPosted: Fri Sep 19, 2008 3:06 am
Hi, not a reply, but a question - still trying to find my way around this question thing and there does not seem any easy way to ask a question in the correct group . . . //
Anyway, i do hope someone can help.
Very recently I purchased a new Plustek 7200i film scanner.
It came with SilverFast 6.5 something that I updated today to 6.6.0r2.
I also down loaded manuals and have been reading solidly again and again but not getting the results I thought I would . .
Been trying to use the iSRD scratch removal. It all seems great during the preview and manual setting and I wait for this wondeful cleaned image to turn up in my Photoshop Elements 5 but all I get is the same scratched image I started with.
What oh what am I not doing correctly??
Charles
Anyway, i do hope someone can help.
Very recently I purchased a new Plustek 7200i film scanner.
It came with SilverFast 6.5 something that I updated today to 6.6.0r2.
I also down loaded manuals and have been reading solidly again and again but not getting the results I thought I would . .
Been trying to use the iSRD scratch removal. It all seems great during the preview and manual setting and I wait for this wondeful cleaned image to turn up in my Photoshop Elements 5 but all I get is the same scratched image I started with.
What oh what am I not doing correctly??
Charles
Re: plustek film scanner 7200 dpi
PostPosted: Mon Sep 22, 2008 9:29 am
Dear Charles,
at what resolution and scale do you scan?
Best regards
Martin
at what resolution and scale do you scan?
Best regards
Martin
Re: plustek film scanner 7200 dpi
PostPosted: Mon Sep 22, 2008 9:43 am
Thanks for your interest. . .
I'm scanning for quite big files - 20 - 30 MB. - Yep, quite high resolution.
Trying to do it once - convert existing film shot into digital, clean them up - they are mostly very scratched from the original processors in Umtata, South Africa. All kept carefully in sleeves since 2001 - 2003 but obviously had a tough time going through developing and printing machines first time round.
Since posting I have noticed that some scratch removal is accomplished by the scanner/software system together but nothing like the preview images suggested was going to be achieved - I could see no difference to begin with!
When I go into to the digital scan in highly enlarges format I see the auto efforts, and often I am redoing those with a clone stamp for much better result.
It still seems that something is not working as it should?
charlea
I'm scanning for quite big files - 20 - 30 MB. - Yep, quite high resolution.
Trying to do it once - convert existing film shot into digital, clean them up - they are mostly very scratched from the original processors in Umtata, South Africa. All kept carefully in sleeves since 2001 - 2003 but obviously had a tough time going through developing and printing machines first time round.
Since posting I have noticed that some scratch removal is accomplished by the scanner/software system together but nothing like the preview images suggested was going to be achieved - I could see no difference to begin with!
When I go into to the digital scan in highly enlarges format I see the auto efforts, and often I am redoing those with a clone stamp for much better result.
It still seems that something is not working as it should?
charlea
Re: plustek film scanner 7200 dpi
PostPosted: Wed Sep 24, 2008 8:58 am
Dear charlea,
are you scanning into 24 Bits or 48 Bits color?
For a test, could you try the other alternative?
Or are you scanning to "48 Bit HDR" ?
Then no filters are applied, at all, and the final scan will be as scratchy as before ...
Best regards,
Martin
are you scanning into 24 Bits or 48 Bits color?
For a test, could you try the other alternative?
Or are you scanning to "48 Bit HDR" ?
Then no filters are applied, at all, and the final scan will be as scratchy as before ...
Best regards,
Martin