Sorry - about negative film profiles once again
PostPosted: Mon Sep 23, 2002 8:09 am
I have got during last summer vacation 25 rolls of negative films.
Since MiniLab photo printing may not be always accurate or appropriate I also invested in UMAX270 with SilverFast 5.5 Ai.
It was a very big disappointment not to find my favorite Kodak Propfoto 100 (14 rolls) and Superia X-tra 400 films (5 rolls) in NegaFix profiles.
The SilverFast soft itself is very convinuent, nice, good.
However if the following citation from SF tutorial is correct why you are so relactant to include to NegaFix all possible negative profiles?
"We all know that the source of the problem is the "orange mask" and the lack of accurate film profiles. Without such profiles ...... .....we generally find ourselves tweaking the preview scan in an attempt to eliminate its worst effects".
Since MiniLab photo printing may not be always accurate or appropriate I also invested in UMAX270 with SilverFast 5.5 Ai.
It was a very big disappointment not to find my favorite Kodak Propfoto 100 (14 rolls) and Superia X-tra 400 films (5 rolls) in NegaFix profiles.
The SilverFast soft itself is very convinuent, nice, good.
However if the following citation from SF tutorial is correct why you are so relactant to include to NegaFix all possible negative profiles?
"We all know that the source of the problem is the "orange mask" and the lack of accurate film profiles. Without such profiles ...... .....we generally find ourselves tweaking the preview scan in an attempt to eliminate its worst effects".