Page 1 of 1

Soft Banding on 120tF / SPrintscan 120...Any solutions yet?

PostPosted: Fri Sep 23, 2005 7:52 pm
by Nitrofunk
Hi All!
Although this issue has been discussed several times, especially with the Polaroid Sprintscan 120, there hasn't been a solution yet.
I've attached a MF-Scan (scanned with the 120tfs Glass-holders, so the Neg was perfectly flat!) that shows this phenomenon: There is a strange Soft-Banding in the scans which results in visible softer grain/details. I've enlarged those areas and marked them with a red line around them.
The only statements I've read from Lasersoft that they didn't have this problem with their Scanner (but it HAS to be there, since so many users have complains about it). And the Microtek support said that this has to be a software issue.
So my suggestion to solve this issue is to help ourselves! Let's throw in every theory that can cause this banding and discuss them. I personaly think that it has to do with the 120tf strange carrier mechanism: Since you have to force the filmholder in, the mechanics might wear out over the time and might cause uneven transport - that shows up in those soft areas.


Any other Ideas?
-Nitro

Here's the sample:
<img src="/img/forum/bild_1_softbaning.jpg">

PostPosted: Fri Sep 23, 2005 7:59 pm
by Nitrofunk
Sorry - here's another link:
http://www.photo.net/photodb/photo?photo_id=3751199

hope it is visible on this one...[/url]

PostPosted: Sat Sep 24, 2005 12:12 pm
by Nitrofunk
Just checked a scan with Microteks Scanwizard software: No banding at all. So it has to be the Silverfast-software that causes the issue...

PostPosted: Sun Oct 02, 2005 9:04 am
by L.Willms
Which firmware level do you use on the Microtek?

I think about flashing the latest Microtek level 1.70 into my Polaroid SS120...


Yours,
L.W.

PostPosted: Tue Oct 04, 2005 10:42 pm
by Nitrofunk
I use Version 1.70.
-nitro

PostPosted: Thu Oct 06, 2005 10:49 am
by L.Willms
Nitrofunk wrote:I use Version 1.70.


Apparantly upgrading to Microtek 1.70 does not solve the "soft banding" issue, does it?

My question in the Polaroid section seems to be answered with this...


yours,
L.W.

PostPosted: Wed Oct 26, 2005 10:41 am
by LSI_Noack
Dear Mr Willms

I hesitate to agree. At least we and Microtek had differents results, cf. <a href="https://www.silverfast.com/forum/viewtopic.php?t=3028&postdays=0&postorder=asc&start=15">my posting</a> in another thread.
Still I asked our developers to double-check this once again.

Best regards
Sonny Noack
- Manager Technical Support, LaserSoft Imaging AG -