From AI to HDR - Gamma & 48 vs 16 bit
PostPosted: Wed Jan 05, 2011 8:03 am
Hi, I scanned a lot of negatives and wonder if I need to rescan everything?
I use the Microtek M1 and scanned with Silverfast 6.6 on a Mac with Snow Leopard. I scanned the negatives for HDR in Silverfast Ai Studio but in the General Options settings I chose a gamma of 2.2 and checked the "output for HDR". My research on forums seem to say I should have not checked this if converting the negatives in HDR and unchecked the gamma would be 1. I, also, embedded a 2.2 grayscale profile to each negative. When simply previewing each TIFF negative they look great with all the original negative info at least viewable on the computer screen.
So now in HDR which I upgraded to HDR 6.6, I am trying to correct for my attaching the 2.2 gamma to my negative scans. When I view them as positive they are quite dark. In the general settings, I marked "Gamma-Gradation" as 2.2. I even went up to 3.0 which seemed to brightened the image in preview. Then I check for HDR output which I guess I don't need check or do I?
Then with "Gamma expected in 48Bit/HDR", am I suppose to match my original scans gamma which was 2.2? It is all a little confusing because of variables.
Finally, I scanned the negatives as 16Bit HDR Grayscale, but it seems that in the HDR program that outputting to 48Bit Color provides more tonal information and outputting to 16Bit Grayscale. Which should I use to maximise data in original 16Bit HDR negative.
One last note, I intend to do final processing in Lightroom. So any help with these questions would be appreciated as soon as possible.
Thank you.
I use the Microtek M1 and scanned with Silverfast 6.6 on a Mac with Snow Leopard. I scanned the negatives for HDR in Silverfast Ai Studio but in the General Options settings I chose a gamma of 2.2 and checked the "output for HDR". My research on forums seem to say I should have not checked this if converting the negatives in HDR and unchecked the gamma would be 1. I, also, embedded a 2.2 grayscale profile to each negative. When simply previewing each TIFF negative they look great with all the original negative info at least viewable on the computer screen.
So now in HDR which I upgraded to HDR 6.6, I am trying to correct for my attaching the 2.2 gamma to my negative scans. When I view them as positive they are quite dark. In the general settings, I marked "Gamma-Gradation" as 2.2. I even went up to 3.0 which seemed to brightened the image in preview. Then I check for HDR output which I guess I don't need check or do I?
Then with "Gamma expected in 48Bit/HDR", am I suppose to match my original scans gamma which was 2.2? It is all a little confusing because of variables.
Finally, I scanned the negatives as 16Bit HDR Grayscale, but it seems that in the HDR program that outputting to 48Bit Color provides more tonal information and outputting to 16Bit Grayscale. Which should I use to maximise data in original 16Bit HDR negative.
One last note, I intend to do final processing in Lightroom. So any help with these questions would be appreciated as soon as possible.
Thank you.