Monoco EZ Color VS Silverfast IT8 Calibration
PostPosted: Mon Aug 15, 2005 10:41 pm
I recently purchased a Microtek i900 scanner with Silverfast AI 6 after years of using Epson scanners via TWAIN import in Photoshop. I must say that it's like I've been handed the keys to a Porsche after driving a scooter.
I also use Monaco EZ color w/ OPTIX XR to calibrate my workflow, but now have the option of using the internal IT8 calibration in Silverfast.
I have profiled both Monaco and Silverfast and have studied the ICC profiles. The Silverfast AI profile has a very large color gamut, while the Monaco EZ color scanner profile is more similar to my working space Adobe RGB (1998), and my Monaco produced Monitor profile.
One side says use Monaco's profile because it is a packaged deal that also profiles the monitor and printer. The other side says use the Silverfast profile because the larger color gamut is more accurate.
Which ICC profile should I trust and use in color conversions? The profile produced from Monaco, or the internal IT8 profile via Silverfast and why?
Thanks for any help in advance. - Aron Hoag
I also use Monaco EZ color w/ OPTIX XR to calibrate my workflow, but now have the option of using the internal IT8 calibration in Silverfast.
I have profiled both Monaco and Silverfast and have studied the ICC profiles. The Silverfast AI profile has a very large color gamut, while the Monaco EZ color scanner profile is more similar to my working space Adobe RGB (1998), and my Monaco produced Monitor profile.
One side says use Monaco's profile because it is a packaged deal that also profiles the monitor and printer. The other side says use the Silverfast profile because the larger color gamut is more accurate.
Which ICC profile should I trust and use in color conversions? The profile produced from Monaco, or the internal IT8 profile via Silverfast and why?
Thanks for any help in advance. - Aron Hoag