PostPosted: Tue Jul 29, 2003 7:06 pm
1. Just an update for the folks following this issue.
2. I have a perhaps related problem with the current version of silverfast ai 6.0 2r31 (described above and in another thread).
3. Anyway, this problem has been going on for the past, 2+ months, we've been writing about this problem, I've personally emailed several folks at support--> nothing, I finally emailed the president--> nothing. I finally resorted to calling the 1-900 number, talked to Martin, of course he wasn't aware of any problem with 2r31, was surprised that people were having problems with this version, was unaware that ian lyons had noted problems with this version etc... I was thinking--> there is something seriously wrong with this picture in that a) we're the paying consumer b) we're going through the normal method of trying to get tech "support" c) yet the tech support people have no clue as to what's going on d) on top of everything else, the paying customer has to pay $2.00 / min to talk to tech support to point out a defect in THEIR product.
4. Bottomline--> they told me to send sample images; I sent in a CD with images from the prior version 6.0 2r20 vs 6.0 2r31 and it should be very apparent that the images via the 2r31 have a definite / abnormal color cast. I hope that they will finally be convinced that something is wrong with this version and fix the bug.
2. I have a perhaps related problem with the current version of silverfast ai 6.0 2r31 (described above and in another thread).
3. Anyway, this problem has been going on for the past, 2+ months, we've been writing about this problem, I've personally emailed several folks at support--> nothing, I finally emailed the president--> nothing. I finally resorted to calling the 1-900 number, talked to Martin, of course he wasn't aware of any problem with 2r31, was surprised that people were having problems with this version, was unaware that ian lyons had noted problems with this version etc... I was thinking--> there is something seriously wrong with this picture in that a) we're the paying consumer b) we're going through the normal method of trying to get tech "support" c) yet the tech support people have no clue as to what's going on d) on top of everything else, the paying customer has to pay $2.00 / min to talk to tech support to point out a defect in THEIR product.
4. Bottomline--> they told me to send sample images; I sent in a CD with images from the prior version 6.0 2r20 vs 6.0 2r31 and it should be very apparent that the images via the 2r31 have a definite / abnormal color cast. I hope that they will finally be convinced that something is wrong with this version and fix the bug.