Page 1 of 1
Which Calibration Target?
PostPosted: Wed Dec 02, 2009 4:32 am
by sfgraphicdesigner
Hi all,
I have a Nikon Coolscan 5000 ED that I will be using to digitise a large photographic archive with, most of which was shot on Fuji film.
Can someone recommend which iT8 target to use. I would assume that the 35mm transparency Fuji target is the logical choice.
Is this correct?
Cheers,
Stephen
Re: Which Calibration Target?
PostPosted: Wed Dec 02, 2009 2:49 pm
by LSI_Morales
Dear Stephen,
For scanning transparencies there are basically two types of IT8 calibration targets you might need.
Ektachrome or Fujichrome (note that these are two different brands, Kodak and Fuji) for normal slides.
Kodachrome for Kodachromes slides.
If all your archive is made out of normal slides you might decide to choose between the Ektachrome from Kodak or Fujichrome from Fuji, no matter if your archive slides are kodak or fuji.
If you have some Kodachromes on the other side, you can only calibrate for Kodachrome scanning using one IT8 target of this emulsion.
Cheers
Re: Which Calibration Target?
PostPosted: Thu Dec 03, 2009 1:02 am
by sfgraphicdesigner
Hi Alejandro,
Thanks for the response much appreciated.
I understand what you are saying, that the calibration is independent of which original slide type you are using except for Kodachrome slides.
Is this correct?
Cheers,
Stephen
Re: Which Calibration Target?
PostPosted: Thu Dec 03, 2009 3:49 am
by degrub
Are you scanning transparencies or negatives ?
topic51.html?hilit=fuji%20film%20calibrationsome relevant comments in above on Fuji
Re: Which Calibration Target?
PostPosted: Thu Dec 03, 2009 8:48 am
by LSI_Morales
Dear Stephen,
sfgraphicdesigner wrote:I understand what you are saying, that the calibration is independent of which original slide type you are using except for Kodachrome slides.
Yes, that is correct
Cheers
Re: Which Calibration Target?
PostPosted: Fri Dec 04, 2009 7:59 am
by sfgraphicdesigner
Thanks degrub,
Interesting thread. All my questions have been answered which is great.
Thanks again to all or the help you guys.
Cheers,
Stephen