Accuracy of Print Calibration / Using with Laser
PostPosted: Fri Oct 30, 2009 3:19 am
Hi, we have an Epson Perfection 3200 Photo that we need to upgrade our SilverFast SE software for. I was noticing the new 'Print Calibration' feature in some of the versions of SilverFast, and it sounds intriguing. But it's a fair amount more money, so I want to make sure it's actually going to be useful for us.
We have a couple printers in the office, but our main printer is a Xerox Doc12 color laser/copier with a Splash RIP. This is one of the more color-accurate laser printer solutions of it's class (especially with this RIP), and many graphics professionals and print shops still use these even though they're a bit old.
So I thought I read somewhere that the print calibration does not support laser printers. Is this true? Is it because they typically drift much more than an inkjet and therefore the results may not be as accurate, or because there is actually some technical limitation?
I'm aware of the limitations of a laser in general, but also know that I have manually customized the profile that our Doc12 was using and got much better results than before. But this was all just 'eyeballing' it and making coarse adjustments here & there. Anything more accurate than that would be a step in the right direction. And this machine does actually have a self-calibrating function using a target to get it to a 'known' working state. This would obviously be done on the proper paper before any profiling, and also before any critical printing.
I'm also curious for a real subjective opinion about the accuracy of these profiles versus one generated using an actual spectrophotometer and professional profiling software. This has always been a bit out of our budget, so if the SilverFast can at least be 'decent' or 'close', it might warrant the purchase price.
And I'm assuming it would work fine for our little Epson Stylus Photo R300, and large-format HP DesignJet 800PS?!?
THANKS
We have a couple printers in the office, but our main printer is a Xerox Doc12 color laser/copier with a Splash RIP. This is one of the more color-accurate laser printer solutions of it's class (especially with this RIP), and many graphics professionals and print shops still use these even though they're a bit old.
So I thought I read somewhere that the print calibration does not support laser printers. Is this true? Is it because they typically drift much more than an inkjet and therefore the results may not be as accurate, or because there is actually some technical limitation?
I'm aware of the limitations of a laser in general, but also know that I have manually customized the profile that our Doc12 was using and got much better results than before. But this was all just 'eyeballing' it and making coarse adjustments here & there. Anything more accurate than that would be a step in the right direction. And this machine does actually have a self-calibrating function using a target to get it to a 'known' working state. This would obviously be done on the proper paper before any profiling, and also before any critical printing.
I'm also curious for a real subjective opinion about the accuracy of these profiles versus one generated using an actual spectrophotometer and professional profiling software. This has always been a bit out of our budget, so if the SilverFast can at least be 'decent' or 'close', it might warrant the purchase price.
And I'm assuming it would work fine for our little Epson Stylus Photo R300, and large-format HP DesignJet 800PS?!?
THANKS