Scanned 35 mm film look too sharp and crispy
PostPosted: Fri Nov 20, 2015 9:25 am
Hello from Paris
INFO:
-I'm using Silverfast SE the updated version (nov. 2015), with a Coolscan V ED, and my computer is a 13 inch 2014 mac laptop, with a glossy retina screen.
-The type of film I'm scanning is 35mm Kodak Portra 160, some Velvia slides, and Ektar 100. The camera I'm shooting with is a Canon AE1 Program, with a 50mm 1.4 lens.
-Most of the time I push-process my films. Most of my films are 100 or 160 iso, pushed to 400.
-I scan my film at 4000dpi, hoping to be able to print them on large photographic paper for exhibitions, or for smaller book printing.
-Some of my film being slightly damaged, I always use the auto ISRD
ISSUE:
When scanning any type of the color film mentionned above (I never tried with B&w because I do mostly color), be it negative or slides, I'm often disappointed by the "oversharp" look. Disappointed because I have chosen shooting film for its softer texture, softer outlines, and "dreamlike look" if I can say so. It is hard for me to let my imagination flow when contemplating a digital photography, because of that "realer than reality" look it has.
At some point I realized that by lowering the contrast within silverfast, I was obtaining softer results. But still, I too often feel that I am looking at a DSLR picture, where everything looks crispy and "too perfect" ... as opposed to the softer esthaetic I'm looking for.
Where does it come from ? Is it because of the retina screen, and its small size? Is it because of the push process ? Could it be the ISRD ?
Thanks for helping.
Aurélien
Is there anything I could do inside Silverfast
INFO:
-I'm using Silverfast SE the updated version (nov. 2015), with a Coolscan V ED, and my computer is a 13 inch 2014 mac laptop, with a glossy retina screen.
-The type of film I'm scanning is 35mm Kodak Portra 160, some Velvia slides, and Ektar 100. The camera I'm shooting with is a Canon AE1 Program, with a 50mm 1.4 lens.
-Most of the time I push-process my films. Most of my films are 100 or 160 iso, pushed to 400.
-I scan my film at 4000dpi, hoping to be able to print them on large photographic paper for exhibitions, or for smaller book printing.
-Some of my film being slightly damaged, I always use the auto ISRD
ISSUE:
When scanning any type of the color film mentionned above (I never tried with B&w because I do mostly color), be it negative or slides, I'm often disappointed by the "oversharp" look. Disappointed because I have chosen shooting film for its softer texture, softer outlines, and "dreamlike look" if I can say so. It is hard for me to let my imagination flow when contemplating a digital photography, because of that "realer than reality" look it has.
At some point I realized that by lowering the contrast within silverfast, I was obtaining softer results. But still, I too often feel that I am looking at a DSLR picture, where everything looks crispy and "too perfect" ... as opposed to the softer esthaetic I'm looking for.
Where does it come from ? Is it because of the retina screen, and its small size? Is it because of the push process ? Could it be the ISRD ?
Thanks for helping.
Aurélien
Is there anything I could do inside Silverfast