Yes, the Version 8.8.0r2 update did fix the jpg compression issue. Great job! Tkx !
The similar issue still exists for the JP2 file format. Could that be fixed as well?
Tkx
George
Search found 4 matches
- Tue Jan 26, 2016 4:09 pm
- Forum: Imaging in general
- Topic: scanned image quality and sizes (JPG and JP2)
- Replies: 3
- Views: 1238
- Fri Jan 22, 2016 4:06 pm
- Forum: New features wishlist
- Topic: "New"image type: PNG
- Replies: 1
- Views: 1120
"New"image type: PNG
We would like to see the file type "PNG" introduced for scanned documents
Less artefacts than JPG, now more and more used on internet....
Many more advantages (see also wikipedia for the non-believers
)
Tkx for considering
George M.
Less artefacts than JPG, now more and more used on internet....
Many more advantages (see also wikipedia for the non-believers
)Tkx for considering
George M.
- Thu Jan 21, 2016 4:14 pm
- Forum: Imaging in general
- Topic: Jpeg file size is dramatically different in SF 8.8 (vs 8.5)
- Replies: 4
- Views: 1052
Re: Jpeg file size is dramatically different in SF 8.8 (vs 8
Hi,
I've mentioned the similar issue for JPG as well as JP2.
I've downloaded version 8.8.0r2 and the issue is solved now !
Great job and very quickly solved indeed!
Tkx
I've mentioned the similar issue for JPG as well as JP2.
I've downloaded version 8.8.0r2 and the issue is solved now !
Great job and very quickly solved indeed!
Tkx
- Tue Jan 19, 2016 2:42 pm
- Forum: Imaging in general
- Topic: scanned image quality and sizes (JPG and JP2)
- Replies: 3
- Views: 1238
scanned image quality and sizes (JPG and JP2)
Hi There, Need some assistance here! I've created some slide scans using my Epson V600. Works fine, no issue there. However, by selecting JPEG or JP2000 ( no PNG available, pity...) I played around with its quality levels, so I generated under identical sicumstances such JPEG files (quality level 10...