Greetings,
Platform: plustek OpticFilm 7600i, Silverfast Ai Studio 6.6.2.r4.
Task: Archiving for multiple use slides and negatives.
I've been advised after asking to enter the output size and the recommended Q-factor of 1.5 and the resolution will be optimally filled in by the software.
I'm trying to create high quality files, and as I have no idea how they'll be used in the future (maybe printed poster size? maybe used in a book?) I want to cover all possibilities as I'm throwing the negatives and slides away after scanning them. So, the output size is kind of irrelevant as I don't know it. Is there an option of scanning the source at a premium quality without scaling (original size) so it will be good for all sizes?
Also I see there are dependencies between the allowed output size and the dpi. The application will rescale without my being able to control this. For example, if the dpi is 3600--I can't scale more than 200%, whereas if I set the dpi to 1800 the image can be scaled to 400% (but not more).
I've read the documentation, but have to admit that it would be helpful if there had been an explanation on these dependencies, with examples and also a bit more on how to really be able to judge what Q-factor is the best for the job.
Will be most grateful for detailed advice.
Donna
understanding settings dependencies
- LSI_Ketelhohn
- LSI Staff

- Posts: 4283
- Joined: Wed May 28, 2008 11:19 am
- Scanner: all
- Location: Kiel, Germany
- Contact:
Re: understanding settings dependencies
Dear Donna,
The resolution used by the scanner is allways the set resolution multiplied by the scaling factor.
e.g.:
3600dpi x 200% = 7200dpi
1800dpi x 400% = 7200dpi
7200dpi is the maximum possible for your device.
This is the largest file you can produce.
kind regards,
Arne Ketelhohn.
The resolution used by the scanner is allways the set resolution multiplied by the scaling factor.
e.g.:
3600dpi x 200% = 7200dpi
1800dpi x 400% = 7200dpi
7200dpi is the maximum possible for your device.
This is the largest file you can produce.
kind regards,
Arne Ketelhohn.
Who is online
Users browsing this forum: No registered users and 1 guest
