With SilverFast Ai Studio ME, how is Multi-Exposure invoked? Are the scans now performed as described in the description of ME?
I am using a supported scanner, Nikon CoolScan V ED (LS-50).
Thank you,
Rocky Pope
SF Multi-Exposure Question
Well, I Performed A Better Search ...
I dug through the QuickTime movies on the website and was able to answer my own question. I didn't realize that the Multi-Exposure mode would not be available until I switched the mode to 48-bit. That was my problem. I went through the Multi-Scan modes and didn't see Multi-Exposure as a choice. Once I switched SF to 48-bit mode, the Multi-Exposure options were available.
RP
RP
Multi-Exposure LS-40
I have the scan mode at either 48 bit or 48 bit HDR and the ME options do not show on the vertical tool bar. I only get the 1 through 16 multi-scan options. It does work on my Epson 4870 with ME.
Thanks
Thanks
Thanks
Mike
Mike
That Sounds Like A Question For ...
That's strange. Your scanner is supported. This might be a question for LaserSoft to answer.
If you're not content to wait for a reply, you might want to call the support line. I had to do this because I had an issue with the scanner being seen by the program. I didn't want to wait for email or the forum. BTW, I have been told that the forums aren't for tech support issues .
Best of luck,
Rocky
If you're not content to wait for a reply, you might want to call the support line. I had to do this because I had an issue with the scanner being seen by the program. I didn't want to wait for email or the forum. BTW, I have been told that the forums aren't for tech support issues .
Best of luck,
Rocky
-
Jaap Driest
- Visitor
- Posts: 3
- Joined: Tue Dec 19, 2006 6:06 pm
- Contact:
Thanks all.
rapope - I was hoping someone here might have had an answer faster than tech support usually replies to questions. As to the scanner being seen, when I updated to 644r7 the Nikon was not detected either but the Epson was. I've contacted tech support and have yet to get a detailed answer other than delete the folder and reinstall. Of course that was already tried so I feel your pain. The upgrade to 65 went smoothly as far as seeing the scanner goes.
Jaap Driest -- I have the 4870 and ME works fine using XP Desktop but the Nikon was not. I switched to Classic and neither showed ME. When I switched back the Nikon is now stuck on 4ME and will not switch to any other setting?????
Have a Merry Christmas and a Good New Year
rapope - I was hoping someone here might have had an answer faster than tech support usually replies to questions. As to the scanner being seen, when I updated to 644r7 the Nikon was not detected either but the Epson was. I've contacted tech support and have yet to get a detailed answer other than delete the folder and reinstall. Of course that was already tried so I feel your pain. The upgrade to 65 went smoothly as far as seeing the scanner goes.
Jaap Driest -- I have the 4870 and ME works fine using XP Desktop but the Nikon was not. I switched to Classic and neither showed ME. When I switched back the Nikon is now stuck on 4ME and will not switch to any other setting?????
Have a Merry Christmas and a Good New Year
Thanks
Mike
Mike
THe Nikon libraries were know to have problems with more than one scanner ( or other device) on the bus at a time. THey liked to be on a dedicated bus port. Don't remember if having two scanners on separate dedicated buses was a problem though.
Depends on if those two bus ports are on the same controller. If not, then should be ok.
Depends on if those two bus ports are on the same controller. If not, then should be ok.
It Turned Out To Be ...
Mike,
I am using Mac OX X. It turned out to be improper permissions to some of the library folders. They apparently weren't set to RW for the active user. LaserSoft put up a revised folder that had the correct permissions applied.
Regards,
Rocky
I am using Mac OX X. It turned out to be improper permissions to some of the library folders. They apparently weren't set to RW for the active user. LaserSoft put up a revised folder that had the correct permissions applied.
Regards,
Rocky
Who is online
Users browsing this forum: No registered users and 1 guest




