I don't see the Kodak Supra line (ASA 100, 400, and 800).
Film was designed to accomodate scanning adicts by including a scratch-resistant coating, so it seems imperative you include it in your list.
Any NegaFix film profiles missing?
Moderator: LSI_Moeller
Kodacolor X
I know this is a really obsolete (C-22!) film, but I work with an archival collection with hundreds of thousands of images shot on this. I have provided HDR scans as requested in the past, and can do so again. The Vericolor profile appears reasonably close, and would probably be a good starting point.
Please be so kind and scan the negatives in SilverFastAi with "Image mode /48 bit HDR colour" as small files of about 5 MB and compress them in SilverFastAi as JPEGs (SilverFastAi / General panel / Scan Mode / Normal (File) / Format: JPEG / Options: Quality at level 8. The resulting size will be about 500 kB.
----
I'd be willing to scan some of my Delta 3200 that meets your requirements. Where should we send the scans?
----
I'd be willing to scan some of my Delta 3200 that meets your requirements. Where should we send the scans?
Please create profiles for the 2 new Kodak UC (UltraColor) films!
Kodak 100 UC
Kodak 400 UC
They are based on the old Portra UC films.
http://www.shutterbug.com/test_reports/0904sb_kodak/
Kodak 100 UC
Kodak 400 UC
They are based on the old Portra UC films.
http://www.shutterbug.com/test_reports/0904sb_kodak/
Missing Profiles
I'm all for asking for some input from the users - but it seems LaserSoft is falling way behind on profiles and I, for one, don't feel like it should be up to the users of your product to keep it current. There aren't that many new films being released each year and there are still a number of regularly available films still not available as Negafix profiles, as people on this forum have pointed out.
I would think that many of us buy your product because it saves us a certain amount of time and work. And I would further suspect that most of us don't have the time or inclination to do the work of shooting per your requirements, scanning and uploading - so that we can have a profile that Lasersoft should already be supplying.
The longer LaserSoft attempts to enlist its users to upgrade its products, the more time a competitor will have to steal your thunder...
I would think that many of us buy your product because it saves us a certain amount of time and work. And I would further suspect that most of us don't have the time or inclination to do the work of shooting per your requirements, scanning and uploading - so that we can have a profile that Lasersoft should already be supplying.
The longer LaserSoft attempts to enlist its users to upgrade its products, the more time a competitor will have to steal your thunder...
-
LSI_Leschke
- LSI Staff

- Posts: 132
- Joined: Thu Aug 02, 2001 1:00 am
Return to “New features wishlist”
Who is online
Users browsing this forum: No registered users and 1 guest