Windows XP and SF Ai Scans
Windows XP and SF Ai Scans
For some reason that is not apparent to me, SF Ai scans saved in my Windows XP system as Tiff files do not appear as thumbnails in Windows Explorer. Trying to open the icons that appears in lieu of the thumbnails using Windows Picture and Fax Viewer results in a message that the image cannot be generated. Image opens just fine using Photoshop, but it is a tedious process to launch PS just to take a quick look at an image. Might someone be able to explain how to solve this problem?
perhqaps the following will be of assistance:
http://support.microsoft.com/default.as ... -us;812003
regards,
http://support.microsoft.com/default.as ... -us;812003
regards,
-
pmitterboeck
- SilverFast Beginner
- Posts: 21
- Joined: Sun Oct 03, 2004 10:48 am
8 bit or 16 bit scans???
Hi!
Maybe I know this problem - on my workstation all scans with 8 bit per channel are displayed and the 16 bit scna not. Photoshop knows the 16 bit format, that's the reason why it displays these scans.
Look for Lview on the internet, this little program suppurts many various formats!!!
Greetings, Peter
Maybe I know this problem - on my workstation all scans with 8 bit per channel are displayed and the 16 bit scna not. Photoshop knows the 16 bit format, that's the reason why it displays these scans.
Look for Lview on the internet, this little program suppurts many various formats!!!
Greetings, Peter
- RAG
- SilverFast Master

- Posts: 761
- Joined: Wed Jan 12, 2005 7:59 am
- Location: Sonoma County, California
Hello,
What I have noticed on my computer (WinXP Pro - 3.6GHZ with 4GB of RAM) is that 16-bit TIFF filese are larger and take longer for the OS to create thumb nail images or to display in the image viewer. I believe file size is key. To explore my theory take one of the images that does not show up and reduce the file size. In my experience 16-bit images display just fine if they are not huge files. This does not mean large files don't display, they just take a very long time, in fact longer than I am willing to wait, so I view them with other applications.
What I have noticed on my computer (WinXP Pro - 3.6GHZ with 4GB of RAM) is that 16-bit TIFF filese are larger and take longer for the OS to create thumb nail images or to display in the image viewer. I believe file size is key. To explore my theory take one of the images that does not show up and reduce the file size. In my experience 16-bit images display just fine if they are not huge files. This does not mean large files don't display, they just take a very long time, in fact longer than I am willing to wait, so I view them with other applications.
Member in good standing - NAPP
A picture is worth a thousand words!
A picture is worth a thousand words!
Return to “Imaging in general”
Who is online
Users browsing this forum: No registered users and 2 guests