Once again, the update has made naming files during Batch Scanning even harder

General topics about imaging

tommyleebones
SilverFast Beginner
Posts: 14
Joined: Sat Mar 28, 2015 6:08 pm
Scanner: Nikon Super CoolScan 4000 (LS-4000 ED)
SilverFast Product: Ai Studio

Once again, the update has made naming files during Batch Scanning even harder

Postby tommyleebones » Sat Nov 26, 2016 2:35 am

Hi, I have several obstacles preventing me from a simple workflow.

A couple of these obstacles are new, after the most recent update. Others are over 1.5 years old:
viewtopic.php?f=2&t=11945&p=38334#p38334

I will group the new and the old obstacles together, as it will be easier to explain.

Basic problem:
I keep my negatives archived in hundreds of pages. I would like to have the filenames match their place in those pages. For example, the 15th negative on Page 143... I would like that scan to be named "Page143_15.jpg"

Silverfast has a function that should be able to name scans successively, but it isn't easy. In fact, it has gotten more difficult over the years.

Problems:
• The "Path" setting (in the Scan Dimensions module) resets with every new negative inserted. So when I click "Batch Scan", I have to navigate to my desired destination folder. You used to be able to save the Path in a Saved Scan Settings, but it seems like you can't Save Scan Settings any more?
• Let's say I did select a "Path" destination in the "Scan Dimensions" module. When I click "Batch Scan," the save dialog opens, but not in my selected folder. It opens one folder higher!
• I can no longer save in the folder I am looking at in the dialog. In order to save, I must select a folder. If there is no folder selected, then the "Scan" button is grayed out.
• The worst of all: the indexing is still not working smoothly. This requires its own list:

•••• Let's say the last file I scanned was called "Page295_27.jpg"
•••• I insert a new strip and click "Batch Scan." The save dialog opens.
•••• Under "Name", it says "Untitled"
•••• But "Start index at" is correct! It says "28"
•••• But I need to fill in "Name". So I click on my last file, the one called "Page295_27.jpg".
•••• Now the "Name" fills in with "Page295_27" ... BUT the "Start index at:" still says 28!
•••• So if I just click "Scan" now, I will get files called "Page295_2728", "Page295_2729", "Page295_2730", etc.
•••• As a workaround, I keep a "dummy file" that just titled "Page295_". If I click on that, Silverfast fills that into "Name". But I have to go into the Finder to change this every time I start a new archival page, which is frequently.

Current Process:

Here is what it looks like every time I would like to scan using the indexing function (which is every scan I do. Hundreds every year).

I must set up my folder structure like this:

Image

Then I follow these steps:

1) If the "dummy file" is incorrect, I must go in the finder and update it.

2) I click "Batch Scan", and I get this dialog.

Image

3) As you can see, I added the Sidebar folder to the sidebar (luckily this stays). I click on that, and I'm taken here:

Image

4) Then I click on my "dummy file" and the "Name" fills itself in:

Image

5) THEN I select the destination folder (This is now the only way to save into the destination folder. I cannot go inside it)

Image

6) Finally I click Scan!

If I miss any of these steps, or do any of them out-of-order... then the file names get very screwed up!

Please please please tell me what I can do differently!

Last time I asked why you couldn't change it back to the old way (which worked perfectly!). You said it was because some other customers wanted this function. I don't understand how this can be easier for anybody!

I also don't understand how this is getting worse. This simple task seems to function less and less over the years!

This seems unacceptable for a program that is so expensive. Silverfast costs almost as much as the ENTIRE Adobe Suite! (over 20 Adobe programs!) And while those programs have their problems, Adobe regularly fixes simple bugs like these.

PLEASE make this function work again. I have to use my workaround dozens of times whenever I am scanning.

Or let me know if there is another way that I can make the indexing function work again!

Thank you.

User avatar
LSI_Ketelhohn
LSI Staff
LSI Staff
Posts: 4283
Joined: Wed May 28, 2008 11:19 am
Scanner: all
Location: Kiel, Germany
Contact:

Re: Once again, the update has made naming files during Batch Scanning even harder

Postby LSI_Ketelhohn » Thu Dec 01, 2016 4:30 pm

Dear user,

Thank you for your feedback.
I will talk to our developers about this.

Kind regards,
Arne

srunions
Visitor
Posts: 1
Joined: Sun Jan 07, 2018 6:51 pm
Scanner: Epson V700
SilverFast Product: SE Plus

Re: Once again, the update has made naming files during Batch Scanning even harder

Postby srunions » Sun Jan 07, 2018 7:07 pm

I don't see any response or solution version offering to this issue raised. I just purchased SilverFast 8 for Batch Scanning of thousands of family photos and this has become a real pain having to reset the destination folder and correct the filename prefix each scan operation. Please offer a quick solution to this problem with the software .... thanks

Regards,

Stephen

User avatar
LSI_Ketelhohn
LSI Staff
LSI Staff
Posts: 4283
Joined: Wed May 28, 2008 11:19 am
Scanner: all
Location: Kiel, Germany
Contact:

Re: Once again, the update has made naming files during Batch Scanning even harder

Postby LSI_Ketelhohn » Mon Jan 15, 2018 9:45 am

Dear Stephen,

Currently, the naming dialog is working as intended.

Kind regards,
Arne

vendee
Visitor
Posts: 3
Joined: Mon Jul 02, 2018 9:31 am
Scanner: Plustek Opticfilm 7500i
SilverFast Product: SE

Re: Once again, the update has made naming files during Batch Scanning even harder

Postby vendee » Tue Jul 10, 2018 6:19 pm

I also found the image naming routine unworkable after updating to the latest version of Silverfast. It is such a pain to have to re-select the save folder for every frame I scan. For me it is an additional 4 or 5 mouse clicks to get back to my save folder each time. I had to uninstall the latest version of Silverfast and re-install my previous version (8.8.0.r10).


Return to “Imaging in general”

Who is online

Users browsing this forum: No registered users and 3 guests