NegaFix on Kodak CL film

General topics about imaging

Allen
Visitor
Posts: 1
Joined: Tue Dec 28, 2010 3:43 pm
Scanner: Plustek 7600Ai

NegaFix on Kodak CL film

Postby Allen » Tue Dec 28, 2010 4:12 pm

I just bought a Plustek 7600Ai and I'm learning how to best scan negatives. The negatives I'm scanning are labeled Kodak CL 200 5093. I'm assuming that CL is the film type and 200 is the setting. Anyone know what the 5093 is?

On NegaFix I'm using Kodak Gold 100 as the default for these negatives since I could not find a setting for CL film and it appeared to look the best.

Does anyone have experience with this film and have any suggestions for NegaFix settings?

User avatar
LSI_Ketelhohn
LSI Staff
LSI Staff
Posts: 4283
Joined: Wed May 28, 2008 11:19 am
Scanner: all
Location: Kiel, Germany
Contact:

Re: NegaFix on Kodak CL film

Postby LSI_Ketelhohn » Wed Dec 29, 2010 11:38 am

Dear Allen,

there are several places on the web you can look up film types.
For example:
on http://www.imageaircraft.com.au/DXsim/ you can check the code on the film cartridge.
on Tom Philo's Homepage under "photo sources and tips" you can find various film codes.


kind regards,
Arne Ketelhohn.

ksg_nikon
Visitor
Posts: 2
Joined: Sun Mar 14, 2010 6:51 pm
Scanner: Nikon Super Coolscan 5000
SilverFast Product: Ai Studio

Re: NegaFix on Kodak CL film

Postby ksg_nikon » Mon Nov 21, 2011 10:37 pm

Kodak CL 200 5093 should be "Kodacolor VR 200", extracted from some not so detailed Google results. It should have been produced until 1986 which fits to the negatives I have taken that year.
The "5093" is missing in the list you can find via Tom Philos homepage.
As I had the same problen (using a Nikon coolscan 5000 ED, SF Photoshop plugin) that I could not find what is written on the old negatives (Kodak CL 200 5093) in Silverfasts Negafix menue I tried various Kodak 200 pofiles and ended up using the "Ektapress Plus 200" profile and increasing the "auto tolerance" and also playing a little with exposure. Maybe a tiny bit blueish but for my feeling still much better than using the VR 200 profile (too much red).
Maybe after 25 years of storage there might be a significant difference of colour "degrading" depending on the individual storage condition.

best regards
Kay


Return to “Imaging in general”

Who is online

Users browsing this forum: No registered users and 2 guests