Hi, and thanks for a great tool!
I've upgraded to Silverfast AI 8.8 (on a Mac running Mavericks, connected to a Coolscan 9000) and noticed that my default 35mm slide scans were now 1.5Mb in size (JPG baseline), from around 10-15Mb with version 8.5.
Scanning slides (w/o iSRD) with the settings: 4000 dpi on the rainbow slider and a full active frame, yields the following results:
- same pixel dimensions (around 3500 x 2500)
- cannot tell if they are of different quality at first glance
- EXIF data show 40dpi vs. 600dpi
- file size of 1.5-1.8Mb (versus >10Mb)
I've played with all sorts of combinations (Custom presets, etc), but cannot figure out what -if anything- is wrong.
Just to be sure, I've downgraded to 8.5.
If you get a chance, I would appreciate some guidance on this issue.
Thanks in advance.
Xen
Jpeg file size is dramatically different in SF 8.8 (vs 8.5)
- LSI_Ketelhohn
- LSI Staff

- Posts: 4283
- Joined: Wed May 28, 2008 11:19 am
- Scanner: all
- Location: Kiel, Germany
- Contact:
-
mansveldgj
- Visitor
- Posts: 4
- Joined: Tue Jan 19, 2016 2:10 pm
- Scanner: Epson Perfection V600 Photo
- SilverFast Product: Ai Studio
- Location: Breda, Netherlands
Re: Jpeg file size is dramatically different in SF 8.8 (vs 8
Hi,
I've mentioned the similar issue for JPG as well as JP2.
I've downloaded version 8.8.0r2 and the issue is solved now !
Great job and very quickly solved indeed!
Tkx
I've mentioned the similar issue for JPG as well as JP2.
I've downloaded version 8.8.0r2 and the issue is solved now !
Great job and very quickly solved indeed!
Tkx
Re: Jpeg file size is dramatically different in SF 8.8 (vs 8
I think that this bug resurfaced in r3 update; I've gone back to r2.
- LSI_Ketelhohn
- LSI Staff

- Posts: 4283
- Joined: Wed May 28, 2008 11:19 am
- Scanner: all
- Location: Kiel, Germany
- Contact:
Re: Jpeg file size is dramatically different in SF 8.8 (vs 8
Please try re-downloading the r3 update and install it again.
There was in deed a wrong installer on the website for a short time.
Kind regards,
Arne Ketelhohn.
There was in deed a wrong installer on the website for a short time.
Kind regards,
Arne Ketelhohn.
Return to “Imaging in general”
Who is online
Users browsing this forum: No registered users and 1 guest