When scanning colour negs, I have found that scanning at low res (say 72 - 300dpi) and using a larger output size of 25x16.18 inches gives me the best results.
Scanning at 3200dpi at the original neg size, does not produce the same quality.. I get a grainy effect?
Is it better to scan at the larger size? Why is this so???????????
TMC
Best setting for scanning Negs
-
LSI_Support
- LSI Staff

- Posts: 491
- Joined: Mon Jun 18, 2001 1:00 am
Hi, I need some more info...
Hello again,
The 35mm negative is 3.36" x 2.13" (inches) @ 3200dpi = 32.6MB image in photoshop. .. But is grainy when I zoom into a persons eye in the photo.
The same 35mm Negative scanned at 25" x 16.18" @180dpi = 36.8m image in photoshop which is much clearer and not grainy when I zoom into the same eye in the photo?
This is true for all the negs I have scanned (about 30 now). Is this the best practice for neg scanning scanning when you need a >32MB image??
(you see to produce a photo for a magazine cover A4 size (300dpi), I need around a 29MB image)
Thanks
TMC
The 35mm negative is 3.36" x 2.13" (inches) @ 3200dpi = 32.6MB image in photoshop. .. But is grainy when I zoom into a persons eye in the photo.
The same 35mm Negative scanned at 25" x 16.18" @180dpi = 36.8m image in photoshop which is much clearer and not grainy when I zoom into the same eye in the photo?
This is true for all the negs I have scanned (about 30 now). Is this the best practice for neg scanning scanning when you need a >32MB image??
(you see to produce a photo for a magazine cover A4 size (300dpi), I need around a 29MB image)
Thanks
TMC
- Gregory C
- SilverFast Expert

- Posts: 366
- Joined: Wed Jan 02, 2002 1:00 am
- Scanner: Nikon Super Coolscan 4000ED
Microtek 5700 - SilverFast Product: Ai Studio
- Location: Hong Kong
- Contact:
if your scanner has a maximum hardware resolution of 4000 dpi, then it can only produce 5527 x 3536 pixels for your 35mm negative (assuming your measurements of 3.36" x 2.13").
according to SilverFast, this calculates to 10752 x 6879 which is far more than the hardware limits of the scanner. a lot of interpolation is happening to create the final image, hence the 'grainy' effect.
according to SilverFast, this calculates to 4500 x 2879 which is less than the hardware limits of the scanner. therefore, very little interpolation is happening and the image is much sharper.
if you're scanning negatives to archive, use the maximum hardware resolution of your scanner. use the resolution slider and select the second-highest resolution available on the slide. don't use the highest resolution because it is not a hardware resolution; it's an interpolated resolution which in my opinion should not be included in the slider's set of available hardware resolutions.
35mm negative is 3.36" x 2.13" @ 3200dpi
according to SilverFast, this calculates to 10752 x 6879 which is far more than the hardware limits of the scanner. a lot of interpolation is happening to create the final image, hence the 'grainy' effect.
35mm negative at 25" x 16.18" @ 180dpi
according to SilverFast, this calculates to 4500 x 2879 which is less than the hardware limits of the scanner. therefore, very little interpolation is happening and the image is much sharper.
if you're scanning negatives to archive, use the maximum hardware resolution of your scanner. use the resolution slider and select the second-highest resolution available on the slide. don't use the highest resolution because it is not a hardware resolution; it's an interpolated resolution which in my opinion should not be included in the slider's set of available hardware resolutions.
Return to “Imaging in general”
Who is online
Users browsing this forum: No registered users and 2 guests