Hi,
For some reason I'm led to believe its better to scan BW negatives in 48 Bits - whats your opinion on this?
Also, if I select 16 Bits will the color profile still be Adobe RGB?
Cheers
Peter
48 Bits or 16 Bits for BW
- LSI_Ketelhohn
- LSI Staff
- Posts: 4283
- Joined: Wed May 28, 2008 11:19 am
- Scanner: all
- Location: Kiel, Germany
- Contact:
Re: 48 Bits or 16 Bits for BW
Dear Peter,
are you planning any kind of post processing? That could benefit from a 48 bit file.
It also is a matter of taste if you want a true greyscale image or rather keep the greenish/blueish tint many B&W films show.
A true greyscale image does not require a colorspace. Some users embed a dummy color space to state the used gamma. However that is not necessary anymore since almost all computer systems use gamma 2.2 now.
Kind regards,
Arne
are you planning any kind of post processing? That could benefit from a 48 bit file.
It also is a matter of taste if you want a true greyscale image or rather keep the greenish/blueish tint many B&W films show.
A true greyscale image does not require a colorspace. Some users embed a dummy color space to state the used gamma. However that is not necessary anymore since almost all computer systems use gamma 2.2 now.
Kind regards,
Arne
-
- SilverFast Beginner
- Posts: 13
- Joined: Tue May 31, 2016 2:24 pm
- Scanner: Epson V700
- SilverFast Product: SE
Re: 48 Bits or 16 Bits for BW
Hi!
Thanks
Yes. I will post process in PhotoLine and ColorPerfect. In the ColorPerfect tutorial on linear scans they suggest grayscale for BW so I am probably just gonna do that. Its just that its easier to view the photos in Capture One but this software dont really read grayscale... but Im gonna do greyscales anyway I suppose.
Cheers
Peter
Thanks

Cheers
Peter
Return to “Imaging in general”
Who is online
Users browsing this forum: No registered users and 4 guests