V-750 PRO 48 bit scan behavior?

flatbed scanners for Epson

drounds
Visitor
Posts: 8
Joined: Sun Jun 04, 2006 11:54 pm

V-750 PRO 48 bit scan behavior?

Postby drounds » Mon Jun 05, 2006 12:20 am

I been trying out my new V-750 PRO and have come across a problem with the 48 bit scan setting. Scans made with this setting are at first glance extremely dark. I suspect that any adjustments I've selected are NOT being applied. I understand that 48 bit HDR scans are raw scans but the 48 bit setting seems to behave the same way and NOT apply any of the adjustments and produces what I believe are raw scans. If I change only the setting, 48->24 bit, the scans are properly adjusted. Am I missing something or is this a possible bug in the V-750 version of SilverFast AI?

Kul
SilverFast User
SilverFast User
Posts: 49
Joined: Wed Mar 08, 2006 11:31 pm
Location: Stuttgart, Germany

Postby Kul » Mon Jun 05, 2006 12:30 pm

48 bit HDR scans do NOT apply adjustments because they're supposed to be processed with SF HDR afterwards
Regards

Kul

drounds
Visitor
Posts: 8
Joined: Sun Jun 04, 2006 11:54 pm

Postby drounds » Mon Jun 05, 2006 1:12 pm

On the V-750, there are choices for both "48 bit HDR" and "48 bit color". The "48 bit color" setting doesn't seem to apply any planned corrections. As a test if I only change "48 bit" to "48 bit -> 24 bit" all the adjustments correctly applied.

Another way to ask this question is shouldn't the "48 bit color" setting behave just like the "48 bit -> 24 bit" setting but produce 16 bits per channel per pixel rather than 8 bits.

User avatar
RAG
SilverFast Master
SilverFast Master
Posts: 761
Joined: Wed Jan 12, 2005 7:59 am
Location: Sonoma County, California

Postby RAG » Mon Jun 05, 2006 6:49 pm

Have you tried using the same scanner profile that Epson Scan is using? I was experiencing dark scans with my 4990 until I change to the same scanner profile used Epson Scan. Won't hurt to give it a try, right?
Member in good standing - NAPP
A picture is worth a thousand words! :-)

drounds
Visitor
Posts: 8
Joined: Sun Jun 04, 2006 11:54 pm

Postby drounds » Tue Jun 06, 2006 1:16 pm

As suggested I tried Epson Scan, making sure that the same scanner profile was being used. The results are the same, Epson scan produces an acceptable 48 bit scan and SF produces a very dark scan when 48 color is selected. I haven't tried the 48 bit HDR setting yet, thats my next test. I really would like to use the power of SF in making this set of 48 bit scans.

User avatar
RAG
SilverFast Master
SilverFast Master
Posts: 761
Joined: Wed Jan 12, 2005 7:59 am
Location: Sonoma County, California

Postby RAG » Tue Jun 06, 2006 3:58 pm

Remember that Epson Scan does an automatic adjustment by default. If you are able to obtain a good scan with Epson Scan then it is possible to obtain a better scan with SilverFast. You just need to make the appropriate adjustments to the settings.
Member in good standing - NAPP

A picture is worth a thousand words! :-)

drounds
Visitor
Posts: 8
Joined: Sun Jun 04, 2006 11:54 pm

Postby drounds » Thu Jun 22, 2006 2:39 pm

I received a reply from lasersoft support suggesting I delete my prefs folder. This solved the problem. Something to remember when strange problems occur?

Kul
SilverFast User
SilverFast User
Posts: 49
Joined: Wed Mar 08, 2006 11:31 pm
Location: Stuttgart, Germany

Postby Kul » Thu Jun 22, 2006 6:48 pm

I received a reply from lasersoft support suggesting I delete my prefs folder. This solved the problem. Something to remember when strange problems occur?


Right!

This seems to be the feature most needed in SF
Regards



Kul


Return to “Epson”

Who is online

Users browsing this forum: No registered users and 1 guest