Silverfast 6.4.3xx and the field "name"

All problems are not listed anywhere

Moderator: LSI_Ketelhohn


turner
SilverFast Beginner
Posts: 11
Joined: Mon Feb 13, 2006 9:05 am
Location: Duesseldorf, Germany
Contact:

Silverfast 6.4.3xx and the field "name"

Postby turner » Mon Feb 13, 2006 9:11 am

Under MacOS 10.4.4 I had so far no problems with SilverFast (two scanner Epson and Nikon). But since the version 6.4.3xx Silverfast accepts no more names in the field ?name?, which have more than 26 characters. Up to the version 6.4.2xx there was no limitation here. Knows someone why this was modified? From Lasersoft I do not receive any response despite repeated inquiries in addition.

User avatar
RAG
SilverFast Master
SilverFast Master
Posts: 761
Joined: Wed Jan 12, 2005 7:59 am
Location: Sonoma County, California

Postby RAG » Tue Feb 14, 2006 5:57 pm

turner,

I just did a test and found that I was able to enter more than 26 characters in the file name field. (The test was done with SilverFast AI Studio version 6.4.3r8)
Member in good standing - NAPP
A picture is worth a thousand words! :-)

turner
SilverFast Beginner
Posts: 11
Joined: Mon Feb 13, 2006 9:05 am
Location: Duesseldorf, Germany
Contact:

Postby turner » Wed Feb 15, 2006 8:26 am

Hello RAG,

I am surprised. Using SilverFast 6.4.3r8 with an Epson Perfection 4870 Photo and 6.4.3r6 with a Nikon Coolscan IV I am not able to enter more than 26 characters in the field "name".
And once again: In version 6.4.2xxx there was no limitation.

How many characters can you enter and what is the hardware you are using with SilverFast ?

Regards
turner

User avatar
RAG
SilverFast Master
SilverFast Master
Posts: 761
Joined: Wed Jan 12, 2005 7:59 am
Location: Sonoma County, California

Postby RAG » Wed Feb 15, 2006 5:32 pm

I am using SilverFast AI Studio 6.4.3r8 with an Epson 4990 on a Windows XP system.

In my test I was able to enter the alphabet twice separated by an underscore.
Member in good standing - NAPP

A picture is worth a thousand words! :-)

turner
SilverFast Beginner
Posts: 11
Joined: Mon Feb 13, 2006 9:05 am
Location: Duesseldorf, Germany
Contact:

Postby turner » Thu Feb 16, 2006 9:17 am

Now I have an answer of LaserSoft:

"First of all it is correct that it behaves as described. This
modification had which background, I know unfortunately only in
approximately - the modification was connected with altogether a
variable concept necessarily amended for a subrange program. To that
extent with the current SilverFast generation "a return to the status
quo" could not be made."

For MacOS is it as I described: Only 26 characters in "name" since version 6.4.3xx. Windows users could be happy that they are not concerned with this change.

Greetings
turner

User avatar
RAG
SilverFast Master
SilverFast Master
Posts: 761
Joined: Wed Jan 12, 2005 7:59 am
Location: Sonoma County, California

Postby RAG » Thu Feb 16, 2006 6:29 pm

Turner,

I am curious to see an example of a file name you would use requiring more than 26 characters. I tend to stick with the 8.3 naming convention and then use other things like IPTC or EXIF for detailed descriptors. Maybe your way of naming files is more efficient, so please do share.
Member in good standing - NAPP

A picture is worth a thousand words! :-)

turner
SilverFast Beginner
Posts: 11
Joined: Mon Feb 13, 2006 9:05 am
Location: Duesseldorf, Germany
Contact:

Postby turner » Fri Feb 17, 2006 6:11 pm

Hello RAG,

I am used to do in the file name of my photos the place and what I have made the photo from. So the file name has up to 50 characters somtimes. In this case I can sort them and have a good overview. And I give the file his name directly in SilverFast.

Naturally when I give photos outside of my own system (to an agency or when I sell it) then I rename the photo and insert correct IPTC-informations.

Perhaps you are interested in photos. Then go to
http://www.fotografie-kunst.com/

Regards
turner

User avatar
RAG
SilverFast Master
SilverFast Master
Posts: 761
Joined: Wed Jan 12, 2005 7:59 am
Location: Sonoma County, California

Postby RAG » Fri Feb 17, 2006 6:33 pm

Turner,

First of all your pictures are beautiful, thank you very much for sharing them with me!

Do you take them all with a film camera and then scan them or do you also use a digital camera?

Have you considered adding photo management software to your workflow? There are applications (i.e. New ACDsee 8 Pro) that allow you to batch rename and effectively keep a data base of all your pictures. You are able to establish categories, keywords etc. for the data base as well as both EXIF and IPTC.
Member in good standing - NAPP

A picture is worth a thousand words! :-)

turner
SilverFast Beginner
Posts: 11
Joined: Mon Feb 13, 2006 9:05 am
Location: Duesseldorf, Germany
Contact:

Postby turner » Sat Feb 18, 2006 9:24 am

Hello RAG,

the photos were all taken as slides and then scanned (all with Nikon equipment). Normaly I sell them over agencies worldwide (in USA with jupiterimages).

In the field of photo management I work with iView Media Pro and I do all that you told me. But I am used to my long names !


Return to “All other problems”

Who is online

Users browsing this forum: No registered users and 1 guest