Hi,
Since I upgraded to Silverfast 8.5.0r2, the batch scan index numbering function operates in a different manner. Has anyone else observed this yet?
The way it now works, is that if I set the "Name" field to, say, Test and the "Start Index at" field to 001, then the first scanned picture's filename is "Test001.jpg". That's good!!
But on the second picture I scan, the "Name" field has automatically changed to Test001, and the "Start Index at" field now says 002, and the picture's filename comes out as "Test001002.jpg". Ah! This is different to before!
.... and the next picture's filename comes out as "Test001002003.jpg", and the next filename comes out as "Test001002003004.jpg" and so on and so on.
Now, I have reported this to the excellent support team, who tell me this change of behaviour was intentional, and they are now evaluating this behaviour with a possible view to changing it back again.
So, I think it would be useful for other people who make use of the Batch Scan Automatic Indexing facility to speak up and say if they prefer the new behaviour, whereby the new index number gets added to the entire previous filename and previous index number, or whether they prefer the previous index number removed and replaced with the new index each time. I know which I prefer!
I remain not quite convinced that this particular change in operation was intended - but we'll have to see if a new release (or a new build) puts it back to the way it was.......
Regards
Chris
Batch Scan File Name gets longer & longer with New Index No.
Moderator: LSI_Ketelhohn
-
- Visitor
- Posts: 1
- Joined: Wed Apr 01, 2015 9:43 am
- Scanner: Plustek OpticFilm
- SilverFast Product: SE Plus
- LSI_Ketelhohn
- LSI Staff
- Posts: 4283
- Joined: Wed May 28, 2008 11:19 am
- Scanner: all
- Location: Kiel, Germany
- Contact:
Re: Batch Scan File Name gets longer & longer with New Index
Dear Chris,
this is an issue due to a change that is supposed to prevent dates and index numbers to be deleted from a file name.
We will correct this behavior in an upcoming update.
Kind regards,
Arne Ketelhohn.
this is an issue due to a change that is supposed to prevent dates and index numbers to be deleted from a file name.
We will correct this behavior in an upcoming update.
Kind regards,
Arne Ketelhohn.
-
- Visitor
- Posts: 2
- Joined: Wed Apr 22, 2015 5:26 pm
- Scanner: Epson V750
Microtek i900 - SilverFast Product: Ai
Re: Batch Scan File Name gets longer & longer with New Index
I am experiencing the same thing in Ai Studio 8.5.0r3
-
- Visitor
- Posts: 2
- Joined: Wed May 27, 2015 9:58 pm
- Scanner: Plustek 8100
- SilverFast Product: SE Plus
Re: Batch Scan File Name gets longer & longer with New Index
This is a uge problem for me too. It slows my scan time down significantly! When will it be corrected?
-
- Visitor
- Posts: 2
- Joined: Thu Oct 23, 2014 6:01 pm
- Scanner: 8800F, 9000F Mark II
- SilverFast Product: SE
- SilverFast Version: 6.6
Re: Batch Scan File Name gets longer & longer with New Index
I updated my SE to versioan 8.5.0r5 but problem described above is still there. also the time between hitting the "batch scan" button and popping up the window "save as" is really extremely long (about 20 sec) - this is really annoying. earlier version was kinda slow, but not that much! and indexing was working just fine
this is step back

-
- Visitor
- Posts: 1
- Joined: Mon Jul 06, 2015 5:05 am
- Scanner: plustek opticfilm 8100
- SilverFast Product: SE Plus
Re: Batch Scan File Name gets longer & longer with New Index
Same problem. Please let us know when it's fixed. super annoying
-
- Visitor
- Posts: 1
- Joined: Fri Apr 07, 2017 5:46 am
- Scanner: Canon 8800F
- SilverFast Product: Ai
Re: Batch Scan File Name gets longer & longer with New Index No.
I am getting this huge delay when selecting batch scanning mode in HDR too. When is it going to get fixed?
Return to “All other problems”
Who is online
Users browsing this forum: No registered users and 1 guest