IT8 - Kodak Vs. Fuji

General topics about SilverFast

Moderator: LSI_Moeller


bsimmons
Visitor
Posts: 4
Joined: Thu Apr 10, 2003 2:26 am
Location: Los Angeles, California

IT8 - Kodak Vs. Fuji

Postby bsimmons » Thu Apr 10, 2003 2:30 am

Why is Fuji more expensive than Kodak? What do I get for my money?
Also, If I switch scanning from prints to negatives should I switch re-calibrate with a Transmissive rather than a Reflective target? Should it be the same size (35mm, 5x7, etc)?

degrub
SilverFast Master
SilverFast Master
Posts: 597
Joined: Fri Dec 21, 2001 1:00 am
Location: Texas

Postby degrub » Thu Apr 10, 2003 3:05 am

1) dunno, There was some mention of some Fuji targets being done by hand. They were very expensive.

2) No such animal for negatives. Only transmissive and reflective media. You can serach the newsgroups and this forum for discussions. Negafix (or similar ) is your only choice.

Frank


Return to “About SilverFast”

Who is online

Users browsing this forum: No registered users and 1 guest