halos around high contrast edges scanning E6 film no ICE

General topics about SilverFast

Moderator: LSI_Moeller


gharhoff
SilverFast Beginner
Posts: 11
Joined: Wed Oct 03, 2007 5:19 pm

halos around high contrast edges scanning E6 film no ICE

Postby gharhoff » Wed Oct 03, 2007 6:48 pm

On quite a number of my scans there are pronounced halos around high contrast edges (noticeable at 100%), rendering the scans virtually useless. At first I thought this is because I switched on Digital ICE (standard) on my last round of scans. But I rescanned one of these slides with and without ICE and it does not make a difference at all. I rescanned using Nikon Scan with ICE enabled and the halos are gone! So I think this is not a problem of the scanner hardware. I use a Nikon Coolscan 9000, Win XP prof., Silverfast Ai Studio 6.5.1r3, normally as a standalone application, no sharpening applied. Film is Fuji Provia 100F or 400F. I know the very same problem has been discussed on this forum with regard to Kodachrome using ICE and has been solved with a Silverfast update. But since this issue occurs with my setup using the lastest SF version and E6 material regardless whether ICE is enabled or not, I don't have a clue what's going on. My halos look exactly like those on the pictures posted on the thread concerning Kodachrome film. Does anybody have an idea?

degrub
SilverFast Master
SilverFast Master
Posts: 597
Joined: Fri Dec 21, 2001 1:00 am
Location: Texas

Postby degrub » Wed Oct 03, 2007 11:17 pm

try manually setting exposure ( wp,bp) and see if that changes it.

any filters applied for the exposure processing in SF ?

just some ideas.

gharhoff
SilverFast Beginner
Posts: 11
Joined: Wed Oct 03, 2007 5:19 pm

Postby gharhoff » Thu Oct 04, 2007 11:39 am

Hi Degrub, thanks for your help! Actually I always manually set white and blackpoint for each RGB-histogram individually, then I adjust curves trying to get as much shadow and highlight detail as possible. I don't apply filters, at least not that I am aware of. Anyway your suggestion set me on the right track: The cause of the problem seems to be that I tweaked curves too aggressively on some scans. I had thought of this, too, therefore I did not apply any adjustments at all when I rescanned one of my problem images yesterday. What I did not realize was that SF had saved my last correction and applied it to this image again. Now I scanned once more and reset the curve before - now the halo is gone. Thanks again, I would not have tried this again had it not been for your suggestion. My next question is: Is there a way in prescan mode to find out how much adjustment you can apply safely? From what I have understood it is better to make these adjustment in SF rather than later in Photoshop.

degrub
SilverFast Master
SilverFast Master
Posts: 597
Joined: Fri Dec 21, 2001 1:00 am
Location: Texas

Postby degrub » Thu Oct 04, 2007 11:31 pm

Well, if you are scanning in HDR mode (nominal 16 bit) then all i do is set B and W and pass it to HDR to work on it ( it could be PS just as well with CS2 or CS3 ) . IF you are scanning with an 8 -12 bit scanner, there is some value in making as many adjustments in the scan as possible so you avoid posterization later. However, you are working with a small portion of the scanned image so it will be a little off on exposure, but usually not to much. But i find if the image was reasonably exposed to begin with for moderate enlargement i don't see any issues.

i don't do much curve tweaking at scan time any more unless the image is poorly exposed or i am combining a high range and low range scan of the same image.

Watch out setting B and W for each channel - you can miss a sunset or two

i do use multiscanning to get the last 1-2 ( 4x - 16x) bits of random CCD noise removed.

Yes, i have been caught by that feature occasionally as well. :-?

gharhoff
SilverFast Beginner
Posts: 11
Joined: Wed Oct 03, 2007 5:19 pm

Postby gharhoff » Fri Oct 05, 2007 12:59 pm

Degrub, thanks so much for your tips! I guess I still have to learn quite a bit about scanning. I was batch scanning a large number of slides and applied my routine adjustments, but now I see that at the end of the day it saves more time to do your homework first rather than having to rescan a whole number of images.

degrub
SilverFast Master
SilverFast Master
Posts: 597
Joined: Fri Dec 21, 2001 1:00 am
Location: Texas

Postby degrub » Fri Oct 05, 2007 11:23 pm

THen i won't tell you about the first 1000 or so i re-scanned :D :D :D

gharhoff
SilverFast Beginner
Posts: 11
Joined: Wed Oct 03, 2007 5:19 pm

Postby gharhoff » Sun Oct 07, 2007 12:30 pm

Wow! I had believed rescanning would be obsolete once I replaced my old scanner with the Coolscan 9000. But I can see your point. Can you recommend any particular learning source or did you just struggle along? I did read Taz Tallys book and another one in German but they didn't alert me to the problems I was facing last week.

degrub
SilverFast Master
SilverFast Master
Posts: 597
Joined: Fri Dec 21, 2001 1:00 am
Location: Texas

Postby degrub » Sun Oct 07, 2007 4:24 pm

Well, there is

www.luminous-landscape.com
for imaging techniques, equipment and learning how to see an image - from the scan and when taking the shot

www.computer-darkroom.com
for silverfast and imaging in general

Then i have learned a lot from

the Yahoo group - under scanners - ScanHi-End where i learned all sorts of technical information about scanning and what is really going on from the drum scanning folks.

FLAAR is another interesting source.

also newsgroup - comp.periphs.scanners

search for any posts by Kennedy McEwen on Nikons - he knows his technical imaging.

You can also look at some of the astronomy photo websites - since it is CCD imaging as well , for more techniques and some software to boot !

multiscanning to reduce measurement noise came directly from the astro guys.

and then for learning how to read an image -

any of the books by Margulis - he is from the old school printing techniques where color reproduction and image quality depended on the skill of the scanner and printer ( and still does - CMS only get you closer usually ;-)) )

Katrin Eismann on retouching is excellent.

and then practice with difficult slides to learn the techniques.

gharhoff
SilverFast Beginner
Posts: 11
Joined: Wed Oct 03, 2007 5:19 pm

Postby gharhoff » Sun Oct 07, 2007 4:40 pm

Thanks so much! I do know Michael Reichman's and Ian Lyons' site, but the others are new to me. I own Eismanns book on masking and compositing and I've been thinking about getting one of the Margulis books for some time, I know his LAB method is being discussed quite controversially. So much to learn... Thanks again for the great tips, next time I'm in Texas I'll have a Shiner on you!


Return to “About SilverFast”

Who is online

Users browsing this forum: No registered users and 1 guest