In the most recent newsletter there is an item that says that AI Studio multi sampling increases DMax from 2.9 to 3.43 for a Nikon LS5000, from 3.06 to 3.33 for an Epson 4990 and from 2.75 to 3.56 for an Epson 3200.
How many passes is this at?
Is there more information on this somewhere?
Were other scanners tested such as the Canon 9950F?
Regards,
Murray Foote
Dynamic Range Increase with Multi-Sampling
Moderator: LSI_Moeller
-
MurrayFoote
- SilverFast Beginner
- Posts: 13
- Joined: Mon Sep 27, 2004 2:59 pm
- LSI_Rossee
- LSI Staff

- Posts: 303
- Joined: Mon Oct 13, 2003 12:14 pm
- Location: Kiel, Germany
- Contact:
Dear Murray.
We used an 8x multisampling for all of our tests.
The Canon was not tested yet but will follow.
We used a standardised procedure under ISO 21550:2004 Dynamic range measurements.
For more info you could got to the ISO webpage http://www.iso.org/iso/en/CombinedQuery ... ring=21550
Kind regards,
Jan
We used an 8x multisampling for all of our tests.
The Canon was not tested yet but will follow.
We used a standardised procedure under ISO 21550:2004 Dynamic range measurements.
For more info you could got to the ISO webpage http://www.iso.org/iso/en/CombinedQuery ... ring=21550
Kind regards,
Jan
-
Tomaz Klinc
- SilverFast User

- Posts: 77
- Joined: Fri Aug 03, 2001 1:00 am
- Location: Slovenia
-
MurrayFoote
- SilverFast Beginner
- Posts: 13
- Joined: Mon Sep 27, 2004 2:59 pm
Jan
Thank you for your response to my query. I did find it somewhat disconcerting though, that the link you pointed me to requested that I pay 75 units of an unknown currency (Swiss Francs perhaps?) before I could read anything. Is there any further free information available? (At the very least it would be interesting to know what the measured DMax was as well as the dynamic range).
Also, come to think of it, can you say anything about when you expect reults for the Canon 9950F? Would that also be in a forthcoming newsletter?
Regards,
Murray
Thank you for your response to my query. I did find it somewhat disconcerting though, that the link you pointed me to requested that I pay 75 units of an unknown currency (Swiss Francs perhaps?) before I could read anything. Is there any further free information available? (At the very least it would be interesting to know what the measured DMax was as well as the dynamic range).
Also, come to think of it, can you say anything about when you expect reults for the Canon 9950F? Would that also be in a forthcoming newsletter?
Regards,
Murray
- LSI_Rossee
- LSI Staff

- Posts: 303
- Joined: Mon Oct 13, 2003 12:14 pm
- Location: Kiel, Germany
- Contact:
RAG wrote:LSI_Rossee,
Does this imply that using 16x multisampling would further increase the DMAX?
Thanks!
Dear All,
generally 16 x multisampling will further decrease noise and increase dynamic range compared to 8x. In our tests we expereinced that the visual difference differs from scanner to scanner. Scanners with already low noise will gain more than scanners that already have a tendency to lots of noise.
We will also test whether there is a pottential issue with the Coolscan LS 30.
Test results with the Canon 9950F should become available this week.
Jan
-
MurrayFoote
- SilverFast Beginner
- Posts: 13
- Joined: Mon Sep 27, 2004 2:59 pm
LSI_Rossee wrote:Test results with the Canon 9950F should become available this week.
Jan
Are the Canon 9950F results available yet? If so are they posted anywhere or is it a case of waiting for the next newsletter?
Also, will there any more detailed information available anywhere without having to pay for it as with the link you posted above?
Regards,
Murray
-
MurrayFoote
- SilverFast Beginner
- Posts: 13
- Joined: Mon Sep 27, 2004 2:59 pm
Who is online
Users browsing this forum: No registered users and 1 guest
